Strategizing a
Career as an Artist
Susan
kae Grant
Grant
Synopsis (Strategizing Career)
by
Paul Melhado
In
this presentation, Susan Grant outlined the seven areas she believes
are crucial to developing a successful career as an artist.
She
began by discussing the issue of fear and the role it plays in impeding
growth, affecting self-esteem or confidence and preventing risk taking.
A satirical song by Katie Lee called “Will to Fail”,
was used to set the tone for this discussion.
Next,
using handouts, she outlined “the seven significant areas in
strategizing a career”. These included; inspiration, courage
and experimentation, production, confidence, portfolio, networking
and professional practices, all of which was clearly defined and
later discussed in details. For example, with regards to the first
construct (Inspiration), she provided a working definition of this
concept based on the process of keeping a journal. Here she suggested
that as artist we should make use of a journal to keep a log of ideas,
provide written context for the work and personalize the work. On
the idea of networking she said that, “all you have to do to
be successful as an artist is to make work and have a network.” This
statement was used to emphasize the importance of developing and
maintaining personal and social contacts within the art world. Cheryl
seconded the motion by reminding the audience that the art world
is a very small place, and that “it is not hard to meet most
of the major players because many of them are fairly accessible”.
Thinking
and working in abundance was another aspect of success that was discussed
as well as the idea that most successful artists are also very prolific.
In other words, the more you work, the more choices you will have
when it comes to editing your work and also the more work you have
the more current it will be. She pointed out that many artists work
from a scarcity of work, which is an obstacle to creating good art.
An abundance of work not only helps in developing your ideas, but
it also helps in articulating them to others. She reminded us that
successful artists are also good sales people who are able to discuss
and promote their work.
On
the issue of courage and experimentation, she reminded the group
that there is no “right way” to make art. For some the
idea must precede the object and for others it is the reverse. Additionally,
she cautioned against doing what you already know or doing what you
know people will accept. “Keep making and sharing your work
with others, no matter what the feedback and acknowledge yourself
for what you have done,” Grant said.
While
some of the participants expressed an air of familiarity with most
of these ideas, few have ever connected them as a holistic approach
to being an artist. Still others expressed some degree of resistance
to the value or importance of networking, citing that their work
stands on its own merit and that it is the art, not the artist, who
develops a following. Disagreement about the separation between the
artist and the work ended the presentation.
Grant
Analysis (Strategizing Career)
by
Henry Tsang
Susan
kae Grant’s presentation was significantly different from the
previous presentation by Mary Virginia Swanson who argued for a balance
between commercial and fine art practice for photographers. Grant
focused on how to survive as an artist not only financially but also
psychologically and spiritually.
In
some ways, the lecture functioned as a pep talk with words of encouragement
for budding graduate students on the verge of entering the art world.
There was much advice shared: like keep trying new things, make lots
of work, don’t be afraid to fail, look at art magazines to
keep abreast of current trends, and listen to inspirational songs
like Katie Lee’s “Will to Fail” (which was played
for us). She also stressed the importance of working and garnering
achievements in order to build up our sense of self-confidence--a
crucial survival technique. I could certainly identify with her difficulty
in portraying herself positively when not involved in projects and
when one’s mental and physical state declines as a result.
Her suggestions on learning how to say “no” is particularly
useful for those who could either use more fine-tuning in personal
time-management or for those who are not clear about what activities
or causes are most important to them. One has only so much energy
to offer, and cannot support and contribute towards everything, so
knowing where one’s ideals and priorities lay can help determine
when best to say “yes.”
Her
strategy during the talk was to offer various options for young artists
to consider in their years to come. However, perhaps the contents
of the presentation could have been adjusted to address a less mature
audience, given that our group’s average age was thirty years
of age or more. Some of us have had a bit of life experience as well
as an exhibition history, whereas the talk seemed to be geared towards
a more general graduate or senior undergraduate perspective.
Another
topic that was presented was that of acquiring business skills. It
is important to understand what one does within a financial and economic
perspective, especially for those who need to worry about paying
for food and rent or are too lazy to collect receipts for the tax
people. However, there seemed to exist a presumption that all artists
desire to align one’s self with the art market and that there
is no alternative to the commodification of one’s work. While
the advice not to make anything that cannot be stored or that is
ephemeral may be pragmatic, this also implies that it’s disadvantageous
and perhaps a bit irresponsible to make art that is noncommercial,
idealistic or visionary. Nevertheless, this was useful in that it
exposed the contradiction that artists live with in trying to find
one’s own way of weaving strategies for economic and professional
survival with the ideals and idiosyncrasies of personal artistic
practice.