Dennis Adams: Out Take
Synopsis by Toshihiro Komatsu
Dennis Adams presented his most recent
work Out Take as an interactive public arts performance piece, site specific
to Germany. The starting point for this work, and presentation, was Adams
fascination with the early 1970s German film Banbule. Adams was attracted
to this film as a metaphor for Germany's history with authority and self-censure.
In 1969, the German State television network commissioned Ulrike Meinhof,
a socially conscientious journalist, to write a film that would critically
address conditions in orphanages. When Meinhof was suspected of participating
in the escape of Andreas Baader, a state prisoner, the film was shelved.
Not until 1995 was there a first screening on German public television,
at midnight.
In preparation for the performance of Out
Take, Adams selected a 17-second clip in which a nun chases a young adolescent
girl through the interior space of an institutional looking orphanage.
Black and white prints were made from the corresponding 416 frames to
be distributed as handbills on the streets of Berlin. Adams rigged a body
costume to structurally support his outstretched arm and thick stack of
8 by 10 stills. He then attached a video camera to his shoulder aimed
towards the stack of handbills. The camera recorded Adams free hand extending
prints to the hands of passerbys seen from the waist down. The resulting
piece was 2 hours and 17 minutes of video documenting each frame passed
into the crowded, noisy streets of Berlin. Adams wandered in circles recording
a soundtrack of disembodied music from nearby vendors, traffic and the
occasional curious query (always ignored).
Discussion followed Adams presentation
of the 17 seconds of footage from Banbule and a 10 minute segment from
the video of his performance in Germany. For Adams, the piece was about
the concept of time. He was taking a small unit of time, extending it
into public space as a feature length transaction, and refilming that.
This transaction between an artist and the pedestrians on the streets
of Berlin was Adams attempt to address the issue of collective memory
in German history. Adams spoke of this project in terms of loss. He saw
this chosen snippet of cinematic history lost again into a city of people
who had only recently rediscovered Banbule.
Analysis by Anja Conrad
A young, adolescent woman is combing her
hair before a mirror in an orphanage while looking at a picture of her
mother. A nun catches her, reprimands her, and then threatens to cut the
young woman's hair off in order to teach a lesson. The young woman takes
off as the nun pursues. A chase ensues.
This is a description of the 17 second
clip in Ulrike Meinhof's censored documentary/film Bambule: a critical
investigation into the poor state of affairs within institutionalized
housing.
Dennis Adams uses these 17 seconds as subject
matter for his own documentary project Out Take: an image-oriented experiment
that frees a once privatized, censored, and therefore controlled expression
by means of textless handbills. The handbills, and Adams himself, act
as disguised "decoys" to remind contemporary culture of its own amnesia.
The site-specific performance consists of Adams distributing four hundred
and seventeen stills of the excerpt taken from Meinhof's film. It is documented
in feature length 217 minutes. Out Take reveals and reinforces how easily
a culture forgets the horrors and tragic conditions that take place throughout
history.
Adams silently distributes the stills in
sequence to the public, while documenting the interaction with a digital
camera. By using the streets of Berlin as the setting, Adams returns the
images from Bambule to its historical origins. He offers no explanation
to the many passersby, only frees the images from Meinhof's film, as if
losing them in the city of Berlin. Many people took the handbills, many
rejected them, and some were taken to be dropped on the streets soon after.
The documentation on Berlin's streets enables Out Take to achieve an incomparable,
atmospheric experience. The camera, mounted to Adams' body, documents
a multi-layered experience with Peruvian music, church bells, techno beats,
cars, buses, scurrying feet, and voices of the German public on the streets.
Out Take is simultaneously a gain in public
freedom and loss in private control. The dispersal of this linear sequence
of still images onto the streets of Berlin not only extends outside the
borders of film, communication, and time, but also furthers the dissection
and adds to the continuous discourse over the possibility of freedom within
institutionalized culture. Adams speaks of the public as a space for the
"collective memory" to be penetrated by expression. But if "humans are
like cattle," as Adams says in his lecture, i.e., we accept what we see
accepted and/or we reject what we see rejected, then his aim is to perform
within that malleable space of the public.
The response to these transactions is left
unstable once unidentified fleeing objects reach hands: the exchange is
consensual, and misunderstanding is given.
Adams's film captures the perception and
reception of human contact and demonstrates how advertising circuits itself
and its messages into a cultural unconscious. Adams does not contribute
to the conventional means of infiltrating information into the public's
unconscious. He uses the handbill to expose the notion of control rather
than to manipulate, and turns the intention of advertising back onto itself.
Historically, authority perpetuates social control and fear. Adams's project
visually displays and provides exciting, yet overdetermined responses
(it's too early for results). Setting free the material, which was once
concealed and censored, into the public space allows Adams to experiment
with the mode of manipulation which advertising implements.
Out Take is a process constantly unfolding
and making new, from taking a scene from Bambule and creating stills out
of it, to the distribution and documentation, Adams explores the elements
of loss and gain within group contact on the social levels of politics
and advertising. Time is lost in this project, as the chase continues.
There is always an outstanding rebel who runs from the hot pursuit of
imposed authority. Adams's choice of photographic information furthers
the metaphor of chase. He seduces the chase of authority throughout history
in hope of refocusing public attention on its ability to run free from
the fiction of a unified whole.
Out Take defies the pretension to make
and keep world order. The art of it is basically the freeing of image
as it moves away from itself. Each phase of the project is another step
in public movement towards multiplicity and away from institutionalized
captivity.
|